Atlas Architect

Decision Instrument

Architecture Portfolio

Candidate Delivery Architectures

Compare plausible architecture options and surface why each fits, where each fails, and what validation should happen next.

Engineered AAV systemic CNS delivery

Feasibility 72%

Summary

Novel capsid family optimized for BBB crossing with liver detargeting motifs.

Why it fits

Matches need for broad CNS coverage with durable expression and low procedural burden.

Main benefit

High upside for scalable CNS exposure from IV route.

Main limitation

Immune escape and translational variance remain major uncertainties.

Key engineering lever

Capsid loop engineering + miRNA liver detargeting module

Recommended next validation

NHP CNS:liver exposure ratio and neutralization profile.

AAV with liver-detargeting priority

Feasibility 67%

Summary

Prioritize off-target suppression and hepatic burden reduction over max potency.

Why it fits

Useful when safety margin is narrow and liver tox is primary gating risk.

Main benefit

Potentially better safety at equivalent systemic dose.

Main limitation

May underperform on deep brain cell coverage.

Key engineering lever

Detargeting motifs + promoter gating

Recommended next validation

Rodent and NHP liver enzyme + brain efficacy curve mapping.

Dual-AAV split-payload strategy

Feasibility 58%

Summary

Split oversized constructs into co-delivered vectors with recombination logic.

Why it fits

Applicable when payload complexity exceeds single-capsid packaging limits.

Main benefit

Extends AAV to larger therapeutic designs.

Main limitation

Co-transduction inefficiency and manufacturing complexity.

Key engineering lever

Payload architecture optimization + stoichiometry tuning

Recommended next validation

Cell-type matched co-expression recovery studies.

Intrathecal/local administration AAV

Feasibility 76%

Summary

Route optimization to bypass systemic barriers and reduce peripheral burden.

Why it fits

Strong where localized CNS regions can drive clinical benefit.

Main benefit

Lower systemic exposure and potentially lower dose.

Main limitation

Procedural burden and uneven tissue distribution.

Key engineering lever

Route protocol + local tropism tuning

Recommended next validation

CSF gradient mapping with region-specific transduction endpoints.

LNP transient editor delivery

Feasibility 52%

Summary

Non-viral editing payload with repeat dosing flexibility.

Why it fits

Alternative when AAV immunity or durability profile is misaligned.

Main benefit

Potential redosing and immune profile advantages.

Main limitation

Durability and CNS distribution may be insufficient.

Key engineering lever

Particle chemistry and targeting ligand design

Recommended next validation

Head-to-head biodistribution with AAV benchmark arm.